18+

Adults only

This season covers the business of the adult industry: companies, money, technology and regulation. There are no images and no adult content here, but the topic is 18+. Please confirm that you are 18 or older.

← Back to internet history
← all stories

Era 2 · Early web: subscriptions and the birth of high-risk billing

1996–2007sold to InterCept (2002), then to Media Billing/Penthouse…

iBill

Internet Billing Company

One of the first major payment processing intermediaries for adult sites: it took on chargebacks and bank relationships for a commission of 12–20% (according to retrospectives); in 2002, by its CEO's account, it ran about $450 million a year through its system (according to the SEC, more than $330 million in 2003); and in 2004–2007 it collapsed not because of a data breach (the legend) but because of the break with its sponsor bank and an avalanche of client lawsuits.

Founders —
Domains ibill.com
paymentshigh-riskchargebacksadult-industrybilling

In brief

iBill was one of the first companies to agree to do what ordinary banks refused to do: accept card payments for adult sites, deal with their abnormally high chargebacks, and pay the sites after deducting its own share. Retrospectives put the commission at 12–20% per transaction estimate. In 2002 its CEO cited volume of about $450 million a year, and a 2004 SEC filing cited more than $330 million for 2003; whether the two metrics are the same is unknown estimate. In 2004–2007 the company fell apart not because of a hacker attack, as the popular version has it, but because its sponsor bank, First Data, exited the category, and lawsuits from its own clients totaling about $52 million followed.

How it started

The founding date has not been firmly established. In a domain dispute, the company itself stated that it had used the IBILL mark since 1995; the business press gives October 1996 and Fort Lauderdale, Florida estimate; a 2004 SEC filing speaks of a seven-year history. The first application for the IBILL mark in the USPTO register is dated 1999-07-01 and was abandoned in 2001 estimate. The names of individual founders do not appear in the sources we read unverified. The first known executive is Garrett Bender, president and CEO: in an InterCept press release of 2002-03-19 he cites a volume of $450 million a year.

The model was built on risk, not on technology. Acquiring banks refused to work with adult sites because of extreme chargebacks, 10–20% against fractions of a percent in ordinary retail estimate. iBill and CCBill, which appeared at almost the same time, filled this gap by acting as an intermediary between thousands of small sites and Visa/MasterCard: negotiations with the bank, fraud control, dispute handling. About 80% of iBill's transactions in 2003 came from merchants with adult content, many of whom could not get a merchant account directly. In 2003 the business press called iBill the industry leader.

Year-by-year timeline

Lesser-known but significant facts

  1. iBill was placed in Visa's anti-fraud program (RIS), with fines from $5,000 to $100,000 a month, and iBill passed the fines on to its merchants. The program's entry criteria were fraud of more than 1,500 transactions and $50,000 a month at a ratio of 0.50% of sales or higher. A separate track was the 1.0% chargeback threshold.
  2. iBill's last owner was an accidental public shell. From November 2002 to 2004-12-31 IBD was in the business of online auctions (IBidUSA.com) and libraries of classic animation art; in 2004-10 it bought a stake in Penthouse Media Group and repositioned itself.
  3. The 2006 iBill data breach was almost certainly a fake. Three addresses out of 17+ million matched the database, the data included Diners Club payments, which iBill, by its own account, had never accepted, and some of the records matched unrelated lists of mortgage leads.
  4. The collapse started with the bank. A 2004 SEC filing already named the dependence on a single sponsor: First Data, through First Financial Bank (Utah), could terminate the agreement on 90 days' notice. After First Data left, clients went months without payouts.
  5. Volume of more than $330 million in 2003 was handled by ~220 people in a single office in Deerfield Beach.

Legend vs. the record

The first growth lever

The lever was not technology but a willingness to name the price of risk: for a commission of 12–20% estimate, iBill stood between thousands of sites and Visa/MasterCard where banks refused because of chargebacks. Along with this, it took on the bank negotiations, fraud monitoring, and disputes that small webmasters could not handle on their own. By 2002, according to the CEO, the model had produced volume of ≈$450 million a year, and according to a 2004 SEC filing, thousands of merchants. Growth came through aggregating merchants who had nowhere else to go. The same lack of alternatives became a vulnerability: payments rested on a single sponsor, and when First Data exited the category, no replacement could be found quickly.

The paired story

The pair is CCBill (history-ccbill). According to the paired dossier, CCBill was founded in 1998 in Tempe, Arizona, by Ron Cadwell, who, according to aggregator profiles, remains CEO estimate; the company is private, by its own data it has more than 30,000 merchants, and a volume of $1 billion+ a year is known only from a third-party review estimate. Both companies worked in the same niche with the same economics, billing for high-risk merchants with recurring payments and chargebacks; iBill appeared two to three years earlier. In 2002 CCBill, iBill, and Epoch/Paycom announced the IPSP registration program under Visa rules to their clients in a single notice; the rules they started from were the same for all of them. The divergence is in the outcome: iBill went through a series of resales (2002 → 2004 → 2005), lost its sponsor bank, and stopped its business in December 2006 amid lawsuits, while CCBill, according to available data, changed neither its owner nor its founder estimate. A detail from sources of the time: when iBill's clients began to see payout delays in late 2004, webmasters on the forum named CCBill, NetBilling, and Epoch as alternatives.

Parallels today (projects from the catalog)

What a builder can take from this in 2026

  1. A niche everyone turns down because of risk is a matter of price, not a prohibition. iBill was one of the first to name the price of risk, and it lived on that price for about ten years.
  2. A single sponsor bank is a single point of failure. The agreement could be terminated on 90 days' notice, and it was the loss of that agreement that set off the missed payouts and the lawsuits.
  3. The legend of a collapse is simpler and more striking than the real story. Hackers leaking the database sells better than a bank exiting the category and clients filing suit after suit; the second version is the one that is documented.
  4. In high-risk, debt and resales pile up fast. Over 2002–2005 the asset changed hands three times: InterCept (≈$104 million for the assets), Penthouse (≈$34 million including costs), IBD (stock), and none of them held on to the business.
  5. Compliance is a constant load. Chargeback thresholds fell in 2003–2004, fines grew, and they had to be passed on to merchants.

Discrepancies and what we could not verify

Sources (primary first)

Secondary (context, cross-checking):

Internet History Keeper

Every historical dossier here is free and open, and it will stay that way. If you want the series to keep going (new dossiers, checks against primary sources, the English edition), support it with a subscription for $9.90 a month. It is support, not access, and you can cancel at any time.

Become a keeper — $9.90 a month →

The same thing, about today

The same breakdowns, but of projects launching right now: what the product is, where the first users came from, how they charge. The card is free, the full dossier is $5 (the dossier itself is written in Russian).

Browse the dossier catalog →