18+

Adults only

This season covers the business of the adult industry: companies, money, technology and regulation. There are no images and no adult content here, but the topic is 18+. Please confirm that you are 18 or older.

← Back to internet history
← all stories

Era 2 · Early web: subscriptions and the birth of high-risk billing

1965–2018the brand is alive: after the bankruptcies of 2003 (Bell/Staton), 2013…

Penthouse

General Media

A magazine that the unemployed artist Bob Guccione put together at a kitchen table in London in 1965 specifically to shoot down Playboy's rabbit had pushed its circulation to almost 5 million copies a month by 1979 (though, according to Encyclopedia.com, it never overtook its competitor), and since then it has gone bankrupt as a company three times (2003, 2013, 2018) under three different owners; each time the brand simply passed into new hands rather than dying.

Founders Bob Guccione
Domains penthouse.com
media-brandhigh-riskdistressed-debtprint-to-webs3-adult

In brief

Penthouse was launched in 1965 by Bob Guccione, a former artist with no money and no publishing experience, specifically as a head-on attack on Playboy: on the very day of the American launch (1969) he ran an ad that took aim at his competitor's rabbit logo. The bet on more explicit content partly worked, and by 1979 circulation had grown to almost 5 million copies a month, but according to Encyclopedia.com, Playboy stayed slightly ahead throughout this period, so the records do not confirm that the leader was ever fully overtaken. The publisher, General Media, went bankrupt in 2003 under the weight of old refinanced debt, before internet porn had even become the main threat. After that the brand went bankrupt twice more (2013 as FriendFinder Networks, 2018 as Penthouse Global Media) and passed to new owners three times through purchases of devalued debt rather than an ordinary sale. Today it is owned by Penthouse World Media, and print is irregular.

How it started (the founders)

In 1965 Bob Guccione was an unemployed artist with no money and no experience in publishing. He put the first issue together himself, at a kitchen table; the American edition came out in September 1969. Guccione chose a competitive strategy from the start: on the day of the US launch he bought a page in the New York Times showing the Playboy rabbit in a rifle's crosshairs with the caption "We're Going Rabbit Hunting." Penthouse already showed more than its competitor thanks to liberal European photo shoots; Playboy answered in kind nine months later, and an open race in explicitness began (the "Pubic Wars"), lasting until 1975, when an overly explicit Playboy cover scared off advertisers for the first time. This race set the mechanic that defined the company's entire history.

Year-by-year timeline

Lesser-known but significant facts

  1. The company went bankrupt three times, not once: in 2003 (General Media), 2013 (FriendFinder Networks), and 2018 (Penthouse Global Media), under three different owners; each time the brand changed hands through an auction or a debt buyout rather than disappearing.
  2. MindGeek fought for Penthouse at the 2018 auction: the tube-site giant, which appears in this season as a separate pair of its own, lost to Prague-based WGCZ (the operator of XVideos).
  3. The 2004 reorganization gave part of the equity to a competitor from an unrelated vertical: among the holders of the new equity was Beate Uhse AG, a publicly traded German erotica retailer (8% of the reorganized company).
  4. Guccione planned to finance his first attempt to get into casinos with income from the film Caligula: the film flopped, and the model of one bet funding another had already failed in 1978–1980, a quarter century before the magazine's debt collapse.
  5. Penthouse's own lawsuit against the Meese Commission (unlike Playboy's) was lost: in 1991 the appeals court granted the officials immunity, and in 1992 the Supreme Court declined to review the case.

Legend vs. the record

The first growth lever

The first growth lever was not advertising in general but a direct provocation aimed at the market leader: a page in the New York Times with the Playboy rabbit logo in a rifle's crosshairs on launch day. Penthouse was already bringing to the US content more explicit than its competitor's, a USP that could be felt immediately at the newsstand. Playboy answered within nine months, and instead of a one-time provocation the result was a years-long race of escalation. By 1979 it had brought a sharp rise in circulation, almost to Playboy's level (~4.7–5 million), although, according to Encyclopedia.com, the company never overtook the leader. The company applied the same mechanic twice more, with the casino project of 1978 into the 1980s and with the hardcore turn of 1997, and both times the cost of escalation turned out to be higher than the gain.

The paired story

Playboy Enterprises and Penthouse (General Media) were publishing empires that went through the same year, 1986 (the Meese Commission letter, the joint lawsuit), and the same threat: falling print circulation long before internet porn. The outcomes diverged. Playboy reached delisting only in 2011, voluntarily and on its own terms ($6.15/share, a plan to shift to brand management), and from the mid-2000s it lived on licensing its name (see the Playboy dossier). General Media went bankrupt as early as 2003, involuntarily, through the courts, and the company went bankrupt three times in all under different owners (2003, 2013 as FriendFinder, 2018 as Penthouse Global Media), each time passing to a new owner through the purchase of devalued debt rather than a managed deal. For Playboy, the salvation was licensing without other people's money; for Penthouse, it was an escalation of content, scale, and debt that gave rise to new debt. The lesson of the pair: attacking the leader sharply accelerates growth (by 1979 Penthouse's circulation had almost caught up with Playboy's, though according to the records it never surpassed it), but a model of constantly raising the stakes demands more and more borrowed money and sooner or later can no longer keep up with servicing it.

Parallels today (projects from the catalog)

What a builder can take from this in 2026

  1. Attacking the leader at launch works, but it opens a race, not a one-time win. The rabbit-hunting ad gave Penthouse instant recognition and pulled it into a race of escalation that lasted for years, where the cost of entry rose with each round.
  2. Before repeating a move that worked, check whether the competitive context is the same. Escalating content won back sales in the 1970s against a specific rival; the same escalation in 1997 only sped up the flight of advertisers.
  3. Debt taken on for one purpose rarely stays the only debt. The 1993 Senior Notes were refinanced twice on ever worse terms (10⅝% → 15%); the company was borrowing not for growth but to service the previous loan.
  4. An asset that is worth money does not disappear in bankruptcy; control over it does. Three bankruptcies in a row did not kill the brand: each time major industry players fought for it (in 2018, MindGeek and Hustler against WGCZ).
  5. Don't fund a risky bet with income from another bet that has not yet proven itself. The casino in Atlantic City was supposed to pay for itself with income from Caligula; the film flopped, and the casino project stalled along with it.

Discrepancies and what we could not verify

Sources (primary first)

Secondary (context, cross-checking):

Internet History Keeper

Every historical dossier here is free and open, and it will stay that way. If you want the series to keep going (new dossiers, checks against primary sources, the English edition), support it with a subscription for $9.90 a month. It is support, not access, and you can cancel at any time.

Become a keeper — $9.90 a month →

The same thing, about today

The same breakdowns, but of projects launching right now: what the product is, where the first users came from, how they charge. The card is free, the full dossier is $5 (the dossier itself is written in Russian).

Browse the dossier catalog →