← all stories

Era 2 · After the crash: new consoles and home computers

1984–1996since 1996, The Tetris Company (a partnership of Pajitnov,…

Tetris

Elorg

The game was invented in 1984 by a Soviet programmer in his spare time on a text terminal with no graphics. The rights belonged not to him but to the state, and for the next five years three Western middlemen ran around Moscow trying to bargain for a license from a Soviet agency, unaware of one another. The winner was not the one who found the game first but the one who first won over the official.

Founders Alexey Pajitnov · Vadim Gerasimov · Dmitry Pavlovsky
Domains —
s2-gamesip-rightslicensingussr

In brief

Tetris was invented in 1984 by Alexey Pajitnov, not an entrepreneur but an AI researcher at a Soviet computing center, on a text terminal with no graphics, simply to test what the machine could do. Under Soviet law the rights to the game belonged not to him but to the state, and that opened a five-year race: three Western middlemen (Robert Stein, the Maxwells through Mirrorsoft, and Henk Rogers) independently tried to bargain for a license from the same Soviet agency, unaware of one another until the last week. The winner was not the one who found the game first (Stein, 1986), nor the one with the money of a media empire (Maxwell), but Rogers's small Japanese studio Bullet-Proof Software, thanks to his friendship with Pajitnov and a $40,000 check written right at the negotiating table. Pajitnov himself did not see a cent of royalties until 1996.

How it started (the founders)

Pajitnov was born in 1955 in Moscow into a family of writers, studied applied mathematics at Moscow State University, and from 1979 worked on speech recognition and artificial intelligence at the Dorodnitsyn Computing Center of the USSR Academy of Sciences. He wrote Tetris not on commission and not for sale, but as a test program for a new machine: a decommissioned Electronika 60, a Soviet clone of the PDP-11 with no graphics display, on which the playing field and the falling pieces were modeled with text brackets and spaces. That Pajitnov began the work in 1984 is undisputed; the exact date of June 6, 1984, however, is more marketing than history (details in Legend vs. the record).

Colleagues took on the port to the IBM PC: 16-year-old Vadim Gerasimov and Dmitry Pavlovsky rewrote the game in Turbo Pascal in about two months, adding color and a high-score table. According to Pajitnov himself, the spread was almost instant and completely uncontrolled: within two weeks, he recalled, Tetris had turned up on every computer in Moscow, with copies passing freely through computer clubs without any commercial plan. It was this uncontrolled leak (not a marketing decision but a side effect of a Soviet computer culture with no notion of intellectual property) that carried the game beyond the USSR: in 1986 it was seen at the SZKI institute in Budapest by Robert Stein, a London software dealer.

Year-by-year timeline

Lesser-known but significant facts

  1. Tetris was created not for sale but as a test of a decommissioned machine's power. The Electronika 60 was a text terminal with no graphics, and Pajitnov drew the field and the pieces with brackets and spaces.
  2. The first Western commercial releases of 1988 formally sold rights that nobody had. Mirrorsoft and Spectrum HoloByte came out at the end of January 1988, three and a half months before Stein signed his contract with Elorg (May 1988).
  3. The key moment of the negotiations was decided not by a lawyer but by back-of-the-envelope accounting. Elorg's Belikov admitted that he deliberately inflated the penalties in the amendments to Stein's contract so that Stein would not notice the redefinition of a computer system that stripped him of console rights: he knew the figures were unrealistic, he said, but he had to focus Stein's attention on them.
  4. Elorg did not disappear with the USSR; it was privatized and later itself became part of the Tetris empire. In 1991 Belikov turned the agency into a private firm, and in 2005 he sold it, including the rights to Tetris, to Pajitnov and Rogers's company for $15 million.
  5. The only version of Tetris for which Elorg actually received money in 1988–89 was the one a negotiator publicly called a pirated copy. Maxwell, on seeing Rogers's Famicom cartridge, declared it a fake, not knowing that Rogers had already written Elorg a $40,000 check for precisely that version.

Legend vs. the record

The first growth lever

The game grew out of nothing twice: first for free and uncontrollably (within two weeks it had filled every computer in Moscow), and then commercially. Nintendo of America planned to bundle the already popular Super Mario Land with the Game Boy. Rogers convinced NOA president Minoru Arakawa of the opposite: Mario was aimed at teenage boys, while Tetris would appeal to everyone. The bet paid off: 2.5 million copies had been sold by early 1990, and more than 35 million by June 2009; for years the bundle has been called the main reason for the Game Boy's success. The lever was not the product (it did not change) but the decision about what to sell it bundled with.

The paired story

Tetris and Bullet-Proof Software are one race for the rights, told from two sides. From the Tetris side, it is the story of a Soviet game with no legal owner: three middlemen—a lone dealer (Stein), a media empire (Mirrorsoft/Maxwell), and a small studio (Bullet-Proof/Rogers)—spent five years independently hunting for the signature of a single Soviet official, unaware of one another until the last week. From the Bullet-Proof Software side, it is the story of how a tiny player won precisely because it was small and personal: Rogers brought a finished Famicom cartridge (130,000 sold) and wrote a $40,000 check out of his own pocket, while Maxwell relied on the status of a corporation and Stein on the priority of his claim. Rights do not follow from being first or being bigger; they are the result of negotiating decisions made by specific people in a specific week.

Parallels today (projects from the catalog)

What a builder can take from this in 2026

  1. A product and the right to the product are different assets, and owning the second decides more. The 1989 court voided the NES version of Tetris not for bad code but for missing rights further up the chain.
  2. Personal relationships with the decision holder sometimes weigh more than the money of a corporate parent. Rogers won not because he offered more than Maxwell, but because he befriended the game's author and won over the negotiator.
  3. A goodwill gesture out of your own pocket reads differently from a promise backed by a parent company's balance sheet. The $40,000 check written on the spot proved more persuasive than Mirrorsoft's guarantees.
  4. Vague wording in a contract is a time bomb, not a detail. The phrase about PCs and other computer systems became a battleground a year later simply because no one narrowed it in advance.
  5. A business built on a platform's tolerance rather than on a contract with the asset's owner is a rental without a lease. That is exactly what happened to Tengen's NES version.

Discrepancies and what we could not verify

Sources (primary first)

Secondary (context, cross-checking):

Internet History Keeper

Every historical dossier here is free and open, and it will stay that way. If you want the series to keep going (new dossiers, checks against primary sources, the English edition), support it with a subscription for $9.90 a month. It is support, not access, and you can cancel at any time.

Become a keeper — $9.90 a month →

The same thing, about today

The same breakdowns, but of projects launching right now: what the product is, where the first users came from, how they charge. The card is free, the full dossier is $5 (the dossier itself is written in Russian).

Browse the dossier catalog →